首页> 外文OA文献 >Indigenous Well-being in Four Countries: An Application of the UNDP\u27S Human Development Index to Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States
【2h】

Indigenous Well-being in Four Countries: An Application of the UNDP\u27S Human Development Index to Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States

机译:四个国家的土著居民福祉:UNDP \ u27S人类发展指数在澳大利亚,加拿大,新西兰和美国的土著人民中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand consistently place near the top of the United Nations Development Programme\u27s Human Development Index (HDI) rankings, yet all have minority Indigenous populations with much poorer health and social conditions than non-Indigenous peoples. It is unclear just how the socioeconomic and health status of Indigenous peoples in these countries has changed in recent decades, and it remains generally unknown whether the overall conditions of Indigenous peoples are improving and whether the gaps between Indigenous peoples and other citizens have indeed narrowed. There is unsettling evidence that they may not have. It was the purpose of this study to determine how these gaps have narrowed or widened during the decade 1990 to 2000.Methods: Census data and life expectancy estimates from government sources were used to adapt the Human Development Index (HDI) to examine how the broad social, economic, and health status of Indigenous populations in these countries have changed since 1990. Three indices – life expectancy, educational attainment, and income – were combined into a single HDI measure.Results: Between 1990 and 2000, the HDI scores of Indigenous peoples in North America and New Zealand improved at a faster rate than the general populations, closing the gap in human development. In Australia, the HDI scores of Indigenous peoples decreased while the general populations improved, widening the gap in human development. While these countries are considered to have high human development according to the UNDP, the Indigenous populations that reside within them have only medium levels of human development.Conclusion: The inconsistent progress in the health and well-being of Indigenous populations over time, and relative to non-Indigenous populations, points to the need for further efforts to improve the social, economic, and physical health of Indigenous peoples.
机译:背景:加拿大,美国,澳大利亚和新西兰始终排在联合国开发计划署人类发展指数(HDI)排名的顶部,但所有这些国家的土著居民的健康和社会状况都比非土著居民差很多。本土居民。这些国家的土著人民的社会经济和健康状况近几十年来发生了怎样的变化尚不清楚,而且土著人民的整体状况是否正在改善以及土著人民与其他公民之间的差距是否确实在缩小,这一点仍然普遍未知。有令人不安的证据表明他们可能没有。这项研究的目的是确定1990年至2000年的十年间这些差距是如何缩小或扩大的。方法:政府提供的人口普查数据和预期寿命估计值用于适应人类发展指数(HDI),以检查该差距如何扩大。自1990年以来,这些国家的土著居民的社会,经济和健康状况发生了变化。三个指标-预期寿命,教育程度和收入-合并为一项HDI指标。结果:1990年至2000年,土著人的HDI得分北美和新西兰的人民的进步速度超过了总人口,从而缩小了人类发展的差距。在澳大利亚,土著人民的HDI得分下降,而总人口的HDI得分下降,从而扩大了人类发展的差距。虽然根据联合国开发计划署认为这些国家的人类发展水平很高,但居住在这些国家中的土著人口的人类发展水平仅为中等水平。结论:随着时间的推移,土著人民在健康和福祉方面的进步并不一致对非土著居民而言,指出需要进一步努力改善土著人民的社会,经济和身体健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号